A does anybody really care? erm not me sick of hearing about it. But they could look at it another way n just be glad it was a camera lens and not one of these?
its like the "Harry pics"
....i mean .....they are all in their 20's - surely you'd be more
worried if they werent doing all that stuff!!!!
nothing like the Harry pics that idiot is never gonna be the king.... not to mention the idiot is costing real soldiers their lives when he plays at soldiers
i dont think thats very fair Oldbiker hes very positive PR if nothing else (i dont know enough about it to say if hes "playing" or doing the same as his colleagues)
And SHES never gonna be king either!!! LOL But so what.... SHE went topless on holiday and someone took pictures....get over it! Shes a relatively normal 20 something its embarrassing for her but nothing to be ashamed of! and as Simon says on a long lens they'll be so grainy there wont be much to see.
So who do you think they might've shot at? The future king of england? or some soppy bint with her tits on display? ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz............ ....................................................
Personally I'm not the least bit interested in seeing the tits of the future queen of England.
The governments of those countries that seem to have the fascination in it should reign in the paparazzi, for gods sake look what happened in thier relentless pursuit of Diana, plus the overlooked fact of showing every nutjob with an inkling for 'fame' the best location for taking along range potshot.
Shoot the paparazzi on sight I'd say.
At the end of the day people taking photographs of our future Queens tits or any persons who is not ok with it is not in the public interest in anyway shape or form and. I think it is well out of order and rightly so should be banned from publishing...... It's one thing shagging out of watch and caught but it's a reasonably new husband and wife on holiday relaxing in the sun.....
But hey they are out there now, so I think they should fine the photographer and papers that print, take themhard financially and donate the proceeds to a worthy cause.... If they ever come to Britain lock the decker up! Ha ha, freedom of press is one thing but this is not a public interest thing....
unfortunately Johnny its we the newspaper buying public who creates a market for pictures like this.
you can only fine the photographer IF he broke the law.
If someone was sneaking around taking pictures of someones non celebrity jigglies, wouldn't they be arrested for some sort of sex crime . The entire woman is a celebrity , not her tits. If any woman was sunbathing in her back garden and some guy leaned over the fence and took a photo of her naked or fully clothed , he would be arrested. Even a page 3 girl would have a right to complain in the above scenario. Dusty x
is this the NEW Dusty.....polite and none controversial! lol please bring back the old one just give him an off switch! ...or better still hide the spade so you know when to stop diggin!