I just feel there is no journalistic benefit... I mean pictures to back up a story of corruption or illicit affairs, but what did she do, topless sunbathing in a private place and as it appears an English photographer living in the South of France, find him out and fine him so heavily it will put a stop to it..... But too late as a news agency has them and is selling rites to them in different countries.... Aw well....iTll be tomorrows chip wrappers very soon....
It's not about journalistic benefit. It's about benefit to the journalist . Journalist !! ?? That's a laugh '' give me some money and I'll show you a photo of a strangers tits.''
nice one Kwak I agree with you totally, never ever bought a copy of that rubbish. I can't begin to understand why people buy it anyway, whose interested in made up stories or Jordans plastic bits ????????
Proper mags like Ride and paper, usually MCN or Angling Times
I've got a good bum shot too , trimmed hair and everything, really cute. But I imagine it will be a bit too much for you all to take . Looks loads better than that scrawny ass of Kate's . Dusty xx
That profile piccy was to show off my new bike rack I'd just finished welding up. It was a hot day so I was naked apart from my leather apron. I put the shorts on to cover my bits in the photo.
You pervs were supposed to check out my bike rack not my RACK. No wonder those photos of Kate sold world wide, you're all perverts, I feel violated . I'm going to need a pint of John Smiths in compensation. Xx lol
Debs, you cheeky bugger, traumatised indeed. The next time we are camping next to each other I'm not putting my radio on to drownd out the buzzing sound coming from your tent. Xx only joking, or am I xx
Instead of making a fuss the Royals' PR machine should have just shrugged it off - cutting the legs off the controversy. Kate was daft thinking she could rely on privacy - this sort of photographer makes his money from getting this type of shot because there's a market for it. The real blame lies with the people that want to see the pics - Joe Public. No interest = no profit.
I wouldn't want to ban this sort of sneak photography though - I'm against censorship and it would play right into the hands of the sort of people that have something to hide and don't want their pictures snapped whilst they're up to it. Dodgy politicians and rich businessmen with envelopes stuffed full of cash for example.