MENU LOGIN 
   Redirecting... ...to our OLD website!


We're still in the process of converting the site to the new format.

Apologies for the inconvenience and thank you for your understanding.

-Matt, Admin

5

Ok - go now to OLD site

No thanks - stay on NEW site


General Chat/Anything Goes

Unbelievable speeding ticket

Unbelievable speeding ticket - Forums [Biker Match] Unbelievable speeding ticket - Forums [Biker Match]
Home / Search Forums / General Chat/Anything Goes /

Unbelievable speeding ticket

 Posts: 48       Pages: 1/3

Post Reply
ok so i've just received my first ever speeding ticket... for driving 124 km/h in a 120 km/h zone.... that's a 3.3% speeding difference. F'ing unbelievable!

   Update Reply
Matt @ 23/06/2009 13:55  

Sorry to hear that Matt

   Update Reply
Deleted User @ 23/06/2009 13:56  

Jeeeez Matt, thats tough going ! But i think 3% and above is the norm? I'm sure someone will be along to correct me if not ...

   Update Reply
Karey @ 23/06/2009 13:57  

Over here its usually 10% + 2 to allow for uncalibrated speedo's but i have heard of people being done for less(usually by shatso's)

   Update Reply
darkcarnival @ 23/06/2009 14:02  

Dark is right u can do 10% over here but for that matt u should have shot them lol then they could have done u for a speeding bullet lol

   Update Reply
UKHarleyRider @ 23/06/2009 15:04  

10% +2mph is an urban myth. 0% +1 mph is all that's required to receive a fine.
Other factors are taken into account, the camera setting, the officer's attitude, the location, the style of riding/driving be adopted, the weather, a whole host of factors. But 10% +2 just isn't true and not a margin to adopt as a policy.

   Update Reply
Deleted Member @ 23/06/2009 15:17  

but imagine being done by a speed camera (not a cop) doing 73mph on a 70mph motorway... that's what ive just got!

   Update Reply
Matt @ 23/06/2009 15:20  

That's the "better" cameras that are being used nowadays with finer calibration, or was it an average between two cameras, as on the Cat and Fiddle? Either way you can thank my cousin, he helped design them.

I don't send him Christmas cards!

   Update Reply
Deleted Member @ 23/06/2009 15:28  

no it was here in Holland where i live, when I was driving past Venlo on the motorway taking my little brother to the airport.

   Update Reply
Matt @ 23/06/2009 15:38  

Matt, I'd worked out it wasn't in the UK, but was it a single camera, or a set of distance/speed avg cameras, like those on the Cat and Fiddle?

   Update Reply
Deleted Member @ 23/06/2009 15:48  

sorry, it was a single camera

   Update Reply
Matt @ 23/06/2009 16:21  

Holland - the only country to make Switzerland appear leniant.

   Update Reply
geoffb2005 @ 23/06/2009 16:55  

here here! :-(

   Update Reply
Matt @ 23/06/2009 17:41  

Hey mate, you were the one who chose to live there

   Update Reply
geoffb2005 @ 23/06/2009 17:52  

Manufacturers original speedometers are only garaunteed 10% accurate at 30 mph Only "calibrated police speedometers" are "known" to be accurate and even then they can be challenged Or so I have been told by traffic cops in the past (I used to work with a few when I was instructing) So I suspect that if a good solicitor challenged it you might get it recinded Its worth a try, depending on the size of the fine and other penalties, the eventual outcome might not be worth the cost of the brief Thats what they rely on

   Update Reply
Emzed @ 23/06/2009 19:21  

http://www.radardetectors.co.uk/police_speedtraps.htm

And I rode with the Essex Motorcycle Police and had a couple as friends. 10% is a myth.

If you do 35 in a 30, 10% +2, a camera will fire and a manned camera will also show you as being over the limit. But hey, you take the chance like we all do, just wait for the post and see what arrives.

And I guess you mean 90% accurate?

   Update Reply
Deleted Member @ 23/06/2009 19:42  

The ACPOTC (Association of Chief Police Officers Traffic Committee) guidelines recommend the 10%+2. This is not to be lenient it is to minimise the number of disputed cases that tie up the courts. It is a guideline and has absolutely no legal status. As the Construction and Use regs in the UK require that a speedometer should have a minimum accuracy of 90% prosecutions for speeding where you are less than 10% over the limit are unlikely to succeed unless there are other considerations which make it an aggravated offence. The majority of English and Welsh "Safety Camera Partnerships" stick to the guidelines, Scotland is a little different.

   Update Reply
prof @ 23/06/2009 19:53  

The Prof is correct. The guidelines do indeed state 10%+2. However, one point to remember is that they are only guidelines, nothing more. They are not law. As such you could be caught for doing 1mph over the speed limit and it would be for you to argue in court that your speedo read on or below the limit. In reality, it is rare (not unheard of, but rare) to be prosecuted for speeds below the 10%+2 rule. Of course, I've just typed all that out, then read Prof's post properly to find that he's already said all this, so I'll shut up now!!

   Update Reply
geoffb2005 @ 23/06/2009 20:00  

well one good thing here is that you dont get points etc. All u get is 4 euros for every 1 km/h over the limit... so my fine is just 16 euros and no points. Still a kick in the teeth tho considering i set my cruise control to 120 km/h in the car!!!!

   Update Reply
Matt @ 23/06/2009 20:02  

Is that it! A 16 euro fine!! I thought you said Holland was strict!!! Think I'd be collecting fines if I lived over there!

   Update Reply
Roachy @ 23/06/2009 20:06  

 Posts: 48       Pages: 1/3

Back to top
Facebook Twitter Google Pinterest Text Email